HomeinterviewsSandiola and ScribeEMR Pair AI With Human Expertise in Healthcare

Sandiola and ScribeEMR Pair AI With Human Expertise in Healthcare

Healthcare providers are increasingly using AI to reduce the administrative burden surrounding clinical documentation, coding and revenue-cycle operations, but the technology still has to fit into workflows managed by clinicians and specialised staff. Sandiola and ScribeEMR are partnering to combine AI-enabled documentation with human-in-the-loop services for clinical documentation integrity, coding, revenue-cycle management and virtual medical-office operations.

Healthcare organisations are under pressure to do more with limited clinical and administrative resources, while documentation requirements continue to expand.

That is creating a growing role for AI in the work surrounding patient care.

Sandiola and ScribeEMR have announced a strategic partnership that will combine AI-powered clinical documentation with human expertise across clinical documentation integrity (CDI), revenue-cycle management (RCM), medical coding and virtual medical-office services.

The partnership is aimed at hospitals, health systems and community healthcare providers, particularly organisations looking to automate parts of administrative workflows without removing specialised human oversight.

The distinction matters.

Healthcare AI is increasingly being positioned as a productivity technology, but clinical documentation and coding are high-consequence workflows. Errors can affect reimbursement, compliance, quality reporting and the completeness of a patient’s medical record.

A human-in-the-loop model attempts to address that challenge by using AI to process information and prioritise work while allowing trained professionals to review, interpret or act on the output.

ScribeEMR brings AI-powered medical charting, remote physician scribing, medical coding, revenue-cycle management and virtual medical-office services to the partnership.

Its ScribeRyte AI platform is designed to support clinical documentation across electronic medical record systems, with standalone AI and human-supported deployment options.

ScribeEMR said it was named Best in KLAS for Virtual Scribing Services for the third consecutive year in the 2026 Best in KLAS: Software & Services report. The recognition provides some external market context for the company’s position in virtual scribing, although awards should not be treated as a substitute for independent evaluation by healthcare organisations.

Sandiola approaches the workflow from the other end of the documentation lifecycle.

The company specialises in AI-powered clinical documentation integrity and Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) optimisation, focusing on community hospitals and health systems.

Its technology is designed to identify documentation that may not fully reflect patient acuity and help CDI and coding professionals determine whether additional information needs to be captured.

The company’s Sandpiper platform reviews inpatient encounters and prioritises cases for CDI teams. Sandiola says the system can review every inpatient chart and deliver continuous case coverage, while its CDI and coding clinicians provide human expertise alongside the technology.

The partnership therefore connects two parts of a healthcare workflow that are often managed separately.

ScribeEMR focuses on generating and supporting documentation closer to the point of care, while Sandiola focuses on ensuring that the patient’s clinical complexity is accurately represented downstream.

For hospitals, that could create a more connected documentation pipeline—from the physician’s note through CDI and coding to reimbursement.

The workforce implications are potentially significant.

Administrative work is one of the largest sources of friction for healthcare professionals. Physicians spend substantial time documenting encounters, while CDI specialists, coders and revenue-cycle teams must process large volumes of information under regulatory and financial constraints.

AI can reduce some of the manual work involved in reviewing records and identifying relevant information. But that does not necessarily mean eliminating the roles responsible for the work.

Instead, the nature of those jobs can change.

A CDI specialist could spend less time searching through charts and more time resolving complex documentation issues. Coders could focus on exceptions and ambiguous cases rather than reviewing every routine record manually. Physicians could spend less time creating documentation from scratch if AI-generated drafts accurately reflect the encounter.

That is the core promise of the human-in-the-loop AI model: machines handle high-volume information processing while people remain responsible for judgement and escalation.

The model also reflects a broader shift in healthcare technology.

Early clinical AI products often focused on individual tasks such as transcription or automated note generation. Newer platforms are increasingly attempting to connect multiple administrative processes, including documentation, coding, workflow management and reimbursement.

For community hospitals in particular, integration may be important because smaller organisations can face tighter staffing constraints than large health systems while still dealing with many of the same regulatory and documentation requirements.

Sandiola CEO Vinnie Whibbs described the partnership as combining documentation at the source with downstream clinical documentation integrity.

ScribeEMR’s senior vice president Terry Ciesla similarly positioned the partnership around improving documentation quality and supporting reimbursement and operational efficiency.

Those claims will ultimately need to be measured through customer outcomes, including documentation accuracy, coding accuracy, denial rates, clinician time savings and financial performance.

The technology architecture is also worth watching.

Sandiola says Sandpiper combines machine learning with Anthropic’s AI models and is trained on historical CDI cases. That reflects a wider trend in enterprise AI: organisations are increasingly combining foundation models with proprietary data, specialised algorithms and human review rather than relying on general-purpose AI alone.

For healthcare buyers, that raises important implementation questions.

How does the system integrate with existing EMRs? How are AI outputs reviewed? What happens when the model is uncertain? How is patient information protected? What audit trails are available? And how does an organisation measure whether automation is actually improving workforce productivity and documentation quality?

Those questions may matter more than raw AI performance.

The Sandiola-ScribeEMR partnership is ultimately a bet on orchestration rather than automation alone. By connecting clinical documentation, CDI, coding and revenue-cycle workflows, the companies are targeting a broader administrative process where information moves from the clinical encounter toward payment.

If the model works as intended, healthcare organisations could use AI to absorb more of the repetitive information-processing workload while reserving human expertise for decisions that require clinical, regulatory or contextual judgement.

That balance will increasingly define the next phase of healthcare workforce technology.

Market Landscape

Healthcare providers are moving from isolated AI experiments toward workflow-level automation.

Clinical documentation is a particularly important area because it sits at the intersection of clinician productivity, medical records, coding, reimbursement and compliance. AI-generated notes and automated chart review can potentially reduce administrative workload, but errors can create downstream financial or clinical consequences.

The human-in-the-loop approach is therefore gaining relevance. Rather than treating AI as an autonomous replacement for healthcare workers, organisations can use it to prioritise information, draft documentation and surface potential issues while trained professionals retain oversight.

For community hospitals, the business case may be especially compelling if technology can extend the capacity of constrained CDI, coding and revenue-cycle teams without requiring proportional increases in headcount.

Top Insights

  • Sandiola and ScribeEMR are connecting AI documentation with CDI, coding and revenue-cycle workflows, targeting administrative pressure across community hospitals and health systems.
  • The partnership illustrates a human-in-the-loop approach where AI processes high-volume clinical information while specialised healthcare workers retain review and decision-making responsibilities.
  • Sandiola’s Sandpiper prioritises inpatient encounters for CDI teams, while ScribeEMR’s technology supports documentation closer to the clinical point of care.
  • Healthcare employers may increasingly redesign administrative roles around AI-assisted workflows, shifting staff time from repetitive chart review toward complex judgement and exception handling.

Join thousands of HR leaders who rely on HRTechEdge for the latest in workforce technology, AI-driven HR solutions, and strategic insights